This is also where Metro stems from: it is a platform that is "simple, clear, and does one thing (and only one thing) relatively easily." Miller described Metro as the antithesis of a power user. Windows 8 was designed for the latter group: the content consumers. ![]() They were described as the computer illiterate younger siblings, the older grandparents, or the mother "who just wants to look up apple pie recipes." Content consumers were explained to be casual users who just use basic social media platforms, view photos, and so on.Content creators were explained to be power users: they have multiple windows open across multiple monitors, they sometimes even have virtual machines that also have their own nested levels of complexity.Miller continued on to explain that the design team split users into two groups: content creators and content consumers: For this discussion, assume that Metro is sh*t for power users (even if you don't believe it to be)." - Miller I've talked about those in the past extensively on reddit, but for this discussion let's throw that all out the window. "I want to talk about why we chose Metro as the default instead of the desktop, and why this is good in the long run - especially for power users.Īt this point you're probably expecting me to say that it's designed for keyboard execution, or some thing about improved time trials for launching programs, or some other way of me trying to convince you that Metro is actually useful. Whatever your view is on the new interface, Jacob Miller, a UX designer for Microsoft that worked on Windows 8, has shared some personal views and responses to criticisms on the /r/technology subreddit of Reddit under the username " pwnies." Some believe that the new Metro- or Modern- interface has seriously affected their workflow, whereas some accepted the Start Screen as a welcomed addition and replacement to the cluttered almost 20 year old Start Menu. since the first pre-beta image leak, Windows 8 has had a mixed reaction. The DE Group has over 19 years TxDOT experience, and they are also familiar with the City of San Antonio, Bexar County, City of Laredo, Webb County and other Municipalities' design and construction guidelines.Since the first beta leak. ![]() ![]() The overall experience includes design and project management for major signal designs for rural, urban and arterial projects including isolated traffic signals, diamond signalized intersections and signalized corridors traffic engineering studies and analyses including signal warrants, speed zone studies and signal timings signing and pavement markings signalization and illumination utility facilities and coordination contract negotiations construction cost estimates preparation of final PS&E QA/QC, construction management including performing pre-construction meetings, managing construction inspection, reviewing and approving construction submittals, record keeping, diaries, monthly estimates, change orders and final project acceptance for Federal, State, City, and County traffic construction projects funded or overseen by TxDOT. The DE Group is responsible for developing, designing and managing PS&E for various traffic signal, flashing beacon, illumination, signing, striping and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) projects with TxDOT in the Laredo District and the San Antonio District. The DE Group brings over 22 years of experience in the design of surface transportation and traffic engineering projects, construction management of transportation and traffic engineering projects and design project management.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |